articles from August, 2000 newsletter:

** President's Message
** 32nd Annual Meeting of Sportsmen's Club is Friday, August 11 at Fortune Bay Resort
** 2000 Loon-Count Results
** Leave wildlife alone
** On Artificial Nesting IsIands for Loons
** Water plants make the lake
** Aquatic plants know what you can and cannot remove
** DNR to increase enforcement, monitoring of lake alterations in Duluth, Grand Rapids, Virginia areas
** Feeding bears is dangerous for people and for bears
** Management of on-site sewage treatment systems
** Delectable But Nasty




back to table of contents


President's Message


Your Board of Directors and member volunteers have maintained a busy schedule this summer. Thanks again to our many volunteers who make the projects of the Club possible. Please call one of your Directors if you are available to help.
Several members are watching over the navigational lights. They are observed daily to be certain that each light is in place and working. Batteries are replaced throughout the summer. We all appreciate the increase in safety while traveling the lake after dark.
The loon count was completed July 19. This is our 17th year of taking the count. We will receive a full report during the Annual Meeting which will be held August 11. Several volunteers again helped Mardy Jackson.
Many members and others are enjoying the current picnic sites. The final details are being worked out for another site in Big Bay. We hope to have an announcement at the annual meeting.
Water samples have been collected during May, June and July. The nitrate and phosphate study sites are in place. This year we are also collecting samples for Sea Grant to look for Zebra Mussels. Several Wisconsin lakes have already been infected.
This year's scholarship recipient was Allison Burgess who graduated from Tower High School this past June.
Last fall the Board of Directors formally applied for a Lake Assessment Program. We have continued discussions throughout the winter and this summer. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and The Sportsmen's Club are co-hosting an initial meeting August 7th at 7:00 PM at the Greenwood Town Hall. The purpose of the meeting is twofold: 1) to discuss the current and historical water quality work conducted in the Lake Vermilion watershed, and 2) to discuss the prospect of a comprehensive lake assessment and watershed plan for Lake Vermilion. Both organizations recognize that because of the size and complexity of the Lake, an accurate lake assessment will require the resources of numerous agencies and organizations. Several participants will be in attendance to give a report on their current and projected projects. Members of the Club are invited to attend.
Please look at our Web Site at: lakevermilion.com/ SCLV. You will be pleased and informed. Also you may enjoy meeting other Lake Vermilion enthusiasts at: www.egroups.com/group/vermilion. Many of those members are also members of The Sportsmen's Club and actively support our organization. We appreciate all of the publicity and support received throughout the year.



back to table of contents


32nd Annual Meeting of Sportsmen's Club is Friday, August 11 at Fortune Bay Resort




Our 32nd Annual Meeting and dinner is set for Friday, August 11, at Fortune Bay Resort. This is the fourth year we have had the dinner meeting at Fortune Bay, and if you were among last year's 200 attendees, you'll recall that the food was excellent, the room was comfortable and we had a great time. As in past years, the meeting will be held in the resort's second floor banquet room.
We're planning a social hour beginning at 5 p.m., followed by a 6 p.m. buffet. Dinner prices are $12 for adults and $6 for children age 12 and younger.
Please phone in your reservations by Monday, August 7. The following members will take your reservations: COOK: Barb Shook, 666-2222 or Vi Harris, 666-2300. TOWER: Paula Bloczynski,7532107 or Shirley Korpela,753-3034.
After dinner the business meeting agenda will include a review of the past year's club projects, featuring reports on NEW day-use picnic sites, this year's 17th annual loon count and the recently begun lake assessment program for Vermilion.
Election of board members is also part of the agenda, and this year we will be electing members to fill the 3-year board positions currently held by Barb Shook, Willis Irons, Pat Borgstrom and Rick Pearson. Barb, Willis and Pat will be seeking re-election. We will also be electing a director to serve the remaining two years of Jack Sparks' board term. Jack has decided to retire from active board status, but will remain as an advisory member of the board. The nominating committee will present candidates for the board positions of Rick Pearson and Jack Sparks, and nominations from the floor will also be accepted.
The club's annual dinner meeting is always casual come as you are in vacation attire - and we'll plan to wrap up the evening in timely fashion so that our boat-access folks have plenty of daylight for their trip home.
This is our one big gathering of the year and a good opportunity for members to bring up matters of personal concern regarding club business or problems around the lake.
We hope to see you on Friday, August 11. Please mark your calendar, phone in your reservation and plan to join us at Fortune Bay Resort for the Sportsmen's Club 32nd annual meeting.



back to table of contents


The 2000 Loon-Count Results


Taken 7-19-00
West End
East End
Singles ... 38 Singles ... 110
Pairs ....... 17 Pairs ........ 24
Chicks ..... 8 Chicks ...... 18
Total Count
148 Singles
41 Pairs
26 Chicks
256 Loons
(Last year's total: 260)




back to table of contents


Leave wildlife alone


Each spring and well into the summer, State Conservation Officers receive calls from people concerned about providing proper care for what they believe is orphaned newborn or juvenile wildlife.
While attempts to "rescue" young wildlife are made with the best intentions, in most cases the efforts are counterproductive to the best interests of the animals involved.
In many cases the young wildlife is not orphaned at all. This is especially true with white-tailed deer fawns and many other mammals as well. Whitetail does typically leave young fawns unattended for long periods of time.
If you discover a young wild mammal or bird, don't handle it. Keep children and pets from disturbing the location. Staying away from the site will prevent stress on the young creature and increase the chances that the adult will return to care for its young.
Unfortunately, some people take young birds and animals out of their natural, wild setting. Not only is this an unwise practice, but most of us don't have the expertise or facilities to care for and raise wildlife.
State Conservation Officers offer the best advice for dealing with young wildlife: "If you careleave it there."



back to table of contents


On Artificial Nesting Islands for Loons
by Mardy Jackson

This subject runs much more deeply than just building these so called rafts and setting them out in the water. The North American Loon Preservation Organization emphasizes in bold print, "THESE SHOULD ONLY BE USED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A BIOLOGIST - OTHERWISE THEY CAN ACTUALLY HARM THE LOON."
These rafts should be regarded as a biological tool - just that - a biological management tool. Its application has been most successfully used where bodies of water are prone to flooding, or where hydro-electric plants change the water levels, or where a breeding pair's attempt has failed due to intensive shoreline predation. And in these cases there must be a suitable site for the raft in the pair's territory, in water of feasible depth, and out of the wind and boating lanes.
The artificial islands DO NOTATTRACT LOONS, they only offer alternative nesting sites to established loon pairs, but do not attract new pairs. Some loon pairs just won't use them. Loons are very territorial. Unless a bay is a very large one, you'll only find one pair to a bay. Everyone living on a lake is familiar with the loon's yodel call - heard it many times. Only the male loon can make this call, and its meaning to another intruding loon is, "go on...git...you are coming into my territory...it's already taken." And by the way, they return year after year to their same territory.
One can see the folly of placing a raft in a location before studying the area for a couple of years to make sure it is not an "occupied" spot.
A raft can prove to be a liability, according to Jeff Fair, director of the Loon Preservation Committee. It can function as a loon "trap" if not situated properly. Take for example: A well-built raft, nicely sodded, and solidly anchored in a shallow cove early in May. It attracts the resident loon pair from their natural...and formerly successful site. Eggs are laid and all is hopeful, until Memorial Day when along come a few fishermen to their favorite fishing spot. The nest is then abandoned or even temporarily left for the eggs to cool off, or a waiting predator seizes the opportunity to raid the nest. Another scenario is the raft breaks anchor in a windstorm and is washed up on shore. These pairs might have had a better chance at their natural nesting sites. Loons naturally and intuitively will select the best sites they can find, sheltered from the prevailing winds and wave action.
Lake Vermilion is a great lake for natural nesting sites, with its uneven shoreline and its 365 islands. Our population of the last seven years has increased to an average of 258 loons on the lake, which includes an increase of chicks also with an average for the last seven years of 37. It's hard telling when a lake has reached its population saturation point. Our highest count ever was in 1993 at 331....it would seem our population is a healthy one at this time.
All of the above is not intended to dampen the enthusiasm, but merely to emphasize the importance of considering the rafts as a management tool. Watch the area you're considering to make sure some loon hasn't hung a "no vacancy" sign up. But most importantly, don't just put one out willy-nilly. These rafts should be used under the supervision of a biologist, so be sure to work with a person from the Department of Natural Resources. You wouldn't want to be responsible for bringing harm to our precious loons.
Here are the instructions for constructing an artificial nesting island.

MATERIALS NEEDED:



TOOLS NEEDED:


ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION:

  1. Notch cedar posts Lincoln log-style and spike together to make four-log frame. (Add a fifth log across the center for extra buoyancy and rigidity if logs are less than 8" diameter.
  2. Stapie fencing about every 4" to the bottoms of the logs, wrapping it up halfway up the sides from underneath.
  3. Secure mesh all the way around the sides making sure that there are no protrusions or "wild" wire ends which might injure a bird.
  4. Attach anchor lines one each to opposite corners (allow enough scope for water depth, usually about 20' overall length) using one clamp on each line.
  5. Attach one cement block to each line using the two other clamps, running line through garden hose where it contacts cement block.
LAUNCHING AND PLACEMENT OF THE ISLAND:

  1. Place it in the water with the mesh side underslung.
  2. Build up a heavy layer of sod, decayed wood or duff (for the roots of plants to take hold in).
  3. Then plant with indigenous vegetationabout two bushelsincluding ferns of all kinds, grasses, sedge mat, mosses, sheep laurel, blue flag iris, cattails, bullrush and other emergent vegetation.
  4. Intersperse with at least two bushels of wet-land type debris for nest building.
  5. If needed, provide a "natural" barrier to windward to prevent waves from washing over nest (spray is okay, but heavy wash will drive the bird and the nest away).
  6. Excess loose material provided will enable the bird to add to its nest from time to time as compaction occurs.
    BE VERY CAREFUL NOT TO OVERLOAD THE ISLAND CAUSING IT TO FLOAT TOO FAR DOWN IN THE WATER!
    THEN: as soon after ice out as possible:
  7. Firmly anchor the island in water at least 4-6 feet deep.
  8. 30 - 50 yards from shore
  9. in a spot protected from prevailing winds and wave action
  10. with a 45 degree angle to anchor lines (note they are slackened to allow for fluctuations in water levels).
PROTECTION

The largest predator problem with these floating artificial nests is human beings. Curiosity seems to be innate in all of us. People boating or swimming near these occupied nests - well, as far as the loons are concerned, "that's all she wrote." So educational posters should be put up at all public places around the lake, marinas, launch sites, resorts, town halls, supermarkets, and in any other obvious places. Floating warning signs should be moored near approaches to the floating islands.
As you can see from all of the above, building a floating island nest is a large job with many ramifications to our loons, so before you launch into this endeaver, please consult with a biologist, preferably at a local Department of Natural Resources office, who knows the area and the lake.
Most of this information comes from the Loon Preservation Committee in Meredith, New Hampshire, and The North American Loon Fund, also in New Hampshire.



back to table of contents


Lake Vermilion Water plants make the lake!


During the spring and summer, people spend time at cabins, enjoy lake activities, and fix up lake property. They watch lakes change and many help lakes remain productive homes for plants, animals, insects, and fish. Unfortunately, some of the fix up and lakeshore changes that lake dwellers make can harm habitat and damage the lake. Removal of lake plants is one example.
Aquatic plants are a natural part of lakes. And, while many lake dwellers want to remove these water plants they cail weeds, there are good reasons to keep them intact. Aquatic plants provide food, nesting sites, and cover for a variety of animals and fish.
This series of three articles wili outline the importance of water plants, what lakeshore owners can do to help preserve habitat, and what lakeshore and aquatic activities are allowable.

Benefits of aquatic plants
Many aquatic plants are a food source - seeds and tubers - for waterfowl. Others support insects and other invertebrates that become food for wildlife. Emergent vegetation furnishes nesting cover for waterfowl, wading birds, shorebirds, and songbirds. Mammals, such as mink and muskrats, also use aquatic vegetation for food and cover.
Minnesota's most sought after fish species depend on aquatic vegetation throughout their lives. Yellow perch, northern pike, muskellunge, panfish, and bass all need aquatic vegetation for food, spawning, and nurseries. Juvenile fish feed on the small crustaceans and insects that live in stands of aquatic plants.
Beyond food and shelter, aquatic vegetation provide many other benefits. They: Cumulative impacts
Alterations to the shoreline and near shore area of lakes can harm essential links between water and land habitats. Typical shoreline alterations include upland clearing, cutting trees and shrubs, converting native grasses to lawn, removing large dead snags and downed logs, making sand blankets, and removing aquatic plants.
Most of these activities don't seem that harmful by themselves. But, as our lakes become more developed and more people change the shoreline, collectively, they can negatively impact the lake.
Cumulative impacts are those which may seem individually minor, but they are collectively harmful and the consequences increase over time, often leading to declines in fish and wildlife populations.
How lake dwellers can help? Lakeshore landowners can minimize the effects of human disturbance and help provide fish and wildlife habitat. Suggested strategies:



back to table of contents


Aquatic plants know what you can and cannot remove?



Aquatic plants belong in Minnesota lakes. They are extremely important habitat for fish, wildlife and aquatic life. But, unfortunately this habitat is disappearing as natural shoreline rapidly disappears and lakeshore development increases.
If aquatic plants interfere with your ability to boat, fish, or swim, make sure you understand the rules before you decide to make changes. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources reminds lakeshore property owners that a permit may be required to remove aquatic plants. If you want to remove some aquatic plants for access to the lake, only remove plants from a small area that will allow you to boat, swim, or fish from your dock. Boat activity will keep the plants from growing to the surface, so use the same route to and from your dock and plant removal may not be necessary.

Aquatic plant regulations:
The following is a short review of aquatic plant regulations. A permit is not required to cut or pull submerged vegetation, like coontail, under the following conditions: A permit is always required when:
Improving aquatic habitat on your lakeshore
Many lakeshore owners are becoming more interested in aquascaping. This includes a variely of activities intended to make shorelines more natural by protecting and re-establishing aquatic plants. If you are interested in planting aquatic plants on your shoreline, you will need a permit from the DNR to transplant aquatic vegetation below the ordinary high water mark on public waters. There is no charge for this permit.
The DNR strongly supports protection and restoration of shoreline, but projects must be carefully planned so they do not cause more harm than good. Projects should minimize disturbance to existing native vegetation, maintain the genetic integrity of existing plant species, and prevent introduction of harmful exotic plants. Just because a plant is offered for sale, doesn't mean it's safe to plant it in the lake.
If you are unsure whether you need a permit, or would like additional information, please call your Area or Regional Fisheries Office.
For more information cail the DNR at 1-888-MINNDNR.



back to table of contents


DNR to increase enforcement, monitoring of lake alterations in Duluth, Grand Rapids, Virginia areas


Below the surface of Minnesota lakes exists a thriving aquatic ecosystem few of us stop to think about. Similar to our more familiar terrestrial world, the underwater environment supports fish, aquatic plants, wildlife, and humans. All are interrelated and dependent upon each other,
A critical part of this delicate system is the near-shore aquatic zone which includes bulrush, cane, lily pad, and aquatic plant stands beneath the surface. In Northeastern Minnesota, overthe last several years, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) conservation officers and other employees have recorded and documented where critical near-shore habitat exist.
The department is targeting several lakes in the Duluth, Virginia and Grand Rapids areas as part of an intensified effort to maintain and monitor near-shore habitats. Lake associations and resort associations are assisting with this effort.
According to Captain Craig Backer, DNR enforcement, "We have the technology to catalog what exists in nearshore aquatic vegetation, lake bottom substrates, and other critical habitat. And, what we have found, is that the Duluth, Grand Rapids, and Virginia areas are at higher risk and most subject to loss associated with development. That is why we are increasing enforcement and monitoring in these areas."
Backer said the DNR has selected four to five lakes in each of these areas, and will watch them closely with the help of concerned citizens and participating lakeshore owners. "We are hoping to stop the loss of these critical near-shore areas, and prevent illegal removal of aquatic vegetation," he said.
Lakes that DNR has targeted for increased monitoring are: (Grand Rapids area) Pokegama, Loon, Twin, Sand, Jessie; (Virginia area) Murphy, Pleasant, Vermilion, Pelican, Elliot; and (Duluth area) Caribou, Leora, Nichols, Pike, Chub.
Certain activities are allowed in near-shore areas. Some activities require permits from the DNR. Others do not. Lakeshore owners are encouraged to call their local DNR office for information on regulations and permitting.
Limited removal of aquatic vegetation is allowed by the DNR. However, sheer volumes and cumulative impacts in recent years necessitates closer monitoring and elimination of illegal aquatic plant removal. Areas with large removal of native species are more susceptible to invasion by exotic and unwanted plant species.
Violation of DNR aquatic plant management statutes or rules can result in costly fines and even more costly court-ordered restoration of affected areas.
"Our lakes can no longer tolerate unnecessary loss of plant life critical to their health. They deserve our help. And, many lakeshore owners are voluntarily working to preserve and restore near shore areas to their pristine condition," Backer said.
To report suspected illegal aquatic vegetation removal or destruction, call your local DNR office. Local offices in the Grand Rapids, Duluth and Virginia areas are:
NE Minnesota Regional office: 218-327-4455
Grand Rapids Enforcement: 218-327-4424
Grand Rapids Fisheries: 218-327-4430
Grand Rapids Waters: 218-327-4416
Duluth Enforcement: 218-879-0899
Duluth Fisheries: 218-723-4785
Duluth Waters: 218-834-6620
Virginia Enforcement: 218-744-7446
Virginia (Ely) Fisheries: 218-365-7280
Virginia Waters: 218-744-7450




back to table of contents


Feeding bears is dangerous for people and for bears


Bears are quick learners according to State Conservation Officer Scott Staples of Moose Lake. "When people who live in bear country feed bears they are essentially teaching bears to come to houses to eat," Staples says. While most of the feeding is unintentional, some may be deliberate. "Either way, feeding bears endangers both the people and the bears."
Spring and early summer is a great time for residents who live close to bear habitat to check around their homes and outbuildings to put away any grain, dog food, birdseed or hummingbird feeders, compost or open garbage receptacles that could attract bears.
"It's so easy for bears to get needed calories from human-related food sources that they stop seeking their natural foods," Staples says. "These bears eventually get into trouble because they return again and again to populated areas."
These "food-conditioned" bears often end up dead bears. When the bear is reported, it may be removed and relocated. Bears that are relocated and return repeatedly may be euthanized because they are so bold around humans at that point they become a threat to public safety.
According to Staples, many bears can be spared this fate if landowners "bear-proof" their homes and outbuildings by removing or securing attractants like livestock feed (3-way, horse cake, pellets), pet food, bird feeders (suet, sunflower seeds, millet, corn, hummingbird feeders) and garbage, and avoid feeding wildlife.
"Wherever bears are located in the state, we need to make a real effort to prevent them from learning bad behaviors," Staples says. "People who live and work in bear country are the key to our success. Together, by securing attractants, we can save a lot of time and resources answering bear nuisance complaints and in the end we'll save a lot of bears' lives."
Any home next to Minnesota's forests or wild lands may be within bear country. Bears also may occasionally wander into towns and neighborhoods searching for food. Anything people or their pets eat will attract bears. Bears learn quickly where to find these sources of food and make a habit of returning. People who live in or near bear habitat can prevent good bears from learning bad-bear behavior by eliminating bear attractants. Here are some tips.

Around the Yard: Garbage:



back to table of contents


Management of on-site sewage treatment systems
KEN OLSON
EXTENSION EDUCATOR - ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION SERVICE



The goal of on-site sewage treatment is to protect human health and the environment by safely recycling wastewater back into the natural environment in a cost-effective manner. Effective on-site treatment of wastewater is dependent on proper design, installation, operation and maintenance of the system. A well-designed system will not properly treat sewage over its intended life without appropriate operation and timely maintenance. Good management of an onsite system will improve the performance and extend the life of the system resulting in reduced total cost to the owner with increased reliability and satisfaction.

Management = operation + maintenance + monitoring
One of the hottest topics in on-site sewage treatment today is the management of systems. Once a well-designed system - including provisions for management - has been properly installed (the responsibility of the designer, installer and inspector) it must be used, watched and taken care of to meet its owner's expectations. This is no different than any other piece of equipment we own.
"Standard" systems have been designed to require minimal management. Existing codes and rules have paid minimal attention to management and few if any enforcement agencies have provided significant encouragement for owners to follow good management practices. This lack of attention to good management has often proved costly to homeowners and the environment. We must now make a concerted effort to increase our attention to management of all systems - standard and "alternative."

What is operation?
"Operation" is the day-to-day use of the system by the residents. The "users" of the system control the quality, quantity and pattern of the wastewater entering the system. The performance of septic systems is greatly influenced by what enters it!
"Using" water does not mean it goes away forever, but rather means that we are changing it from "clean water" to "dirty water" by adding human wastes, food particles, cleaners, soil, lint and other materials.These additions contain pathogens, organic and inorganic solids, nutrients and chemicals. We are counting on the system to clean it again for reuse later. Users determine the quantity of water used by the number of gallons per flush of the toilet, the length of showers, the number of loads of clothes washed, faucets running while brushing teeth or washing dishes, as well as the frequency of doing each of these things, and all other water use practices.

What is maintenance?
"Maintenance" is the work of doing periodic upkeep on the system. It includes the repair, replacement, and cleaning of existing components. It can also be thc addition of new components to enhance performance.
Examples of maintenance are: the repair of leaking fixtures and appliances, the replacement of septic tank baffles or weak pumps, the cleaning of effluent screens or lint filters, the removal of solids from a septic tank or composting toilet, or the addition of an effluent screen to the outlet baffle.

What is monitoring?
The monitoring of a system is the observation or testing of all on-site system components. It could even mean the testing of effluent or contents. An important aspect of monitoring is to know what needs to be watched, when it should be done and who is going to do it - a plan. The results of monitoring should be recorded and the information used by those doing "operation" and "maintenance." The use of the information is what makes it valuable.
Examples of monitoring may include: knowng what goes down the drain; reading and recording the results of a flow meter; checking baffles, screens, pumps and alarms for proper function; noting wet spots near the drainfield or mound; recording the date and condition of the septic tank when it is pumped; or sampling and testing effluent from a performance system and reporting the information to a local agency as required.

Management of "alternative treatment systems"
Specific operation, maintenance and monitoring procedures should be planned and followed to provide good management of all systems. "Alternative" treatment systems (i.e. sand/peat filters, constructed wetlands, aerobic tanks, composting units, etc.) typically involve special mechanical components, living plants, or other devices, which require special knowledge, skill and attention to perform as designed.
Owners may wish to, or be required to, hire professional management of an "alternative" system. The complexity and costs of management must be an important criteria considered in the initial selection of an "alternative" system.

Who, when, how?
Total management of a system must involve the residents generating the sewage with varying levels of assistance from professionals. The individual owner will likely determine management responsibilities of a single household system. Traditional trench and mound systems requiring relatively simple management are typically managed by the owner using licensed pumpers and other professionals as needed. Home owners are capable of handling typical management tasks if they are aware of what needs to be done and make a commitment to it. Owners of complex systems or those unwilling to make the commitment may feel the necessity or be required to hire outside professional management. More opportunities to "contract out" some steps will likely be available in the future.
Multiple-household systems have another dimension to management-other users. Each homeowner is responsible for the content and quantity of the wastewater generated and must rely on co-users to be equally careful. All users collectively are responsible to each other and or the management of the commonly used portions of the system. Common components could include large "community" septic tanks, pre-treatment units or the soil treatment/dispersal system (i.e. trench, mound, wetland, drip lines, etc.).
A good management plan wili specify "who will do what" and "when and how" they will do it. Each system is unique. The plan must be for the specific system and must be followed to be effective. In some multi-household systems, residents can do some management tasks, such as reading water meters, but most functions will require additional equipment, skill and commitment.
The amount and cost of management will vary considerably with the size, type and complexity of the treatment system. Owners must be willing to pay for the necessary management to achieve effectiveness and efficiency of their investment.
The bottom line is that a responsible person or entity - resident, business or private/public organization, must be designated to know and carry out the specific management practices required for successful treatment of wastewater in any system including on-site systems.



back to table of contents


Delectable But Nasty
Minnesota Lakes Assocation Reporter
July/August 2000



Minnesota has discovered a delectable Louisiana tradition-the rusty crayfish. However, this exotic invader to Minnesota, a native species in the Ohio River Valley, is not only delectable, but it can ruin fish and wildlife habitat, and once it gains a foothold, there is no safe way to eradicate them.
Rusty crayfish are thought to have spread to Minnesota as live bait used by non-resident anglers, by commercial harvesters, releases by students or teachers after studying crayfish purchased from a biological supply house, or through ballast water discharges.
"Rusty crayfish can quickly reach high densities; they can displace native crayfish and clear-cut aquatic plant beds because of their high metabolic rate and appetite. Because of their aggressive behavior, they have less predation from game fish than native crayfish, and they are known to chase fish from nests, then eat their eggs," said Doug Jensen, University of Minnesota Sea Grant Exotic Species Information Center coordinator.

Distribution
Rusty crayfish were first observed in 1967 at Otter Creek in southern Minnesota. A statewide study (Helgen 1990) reported their presence in many areas, and so far they have been found in 13 counties and 47 different lakes, rivers, and streams in Minnesota, including St. Louis Bay and the Pigeon River on Lake Superior. They have rapidly expanded throughout Wisconsin lakes and streams since their introduction there around 1960 and are also found in parts of Michigan, lowa, Missouri, every New England state, New York, Pennsylvania, New Mexico, and in southern Ontario, Canada.
Accordng to Gary Montz aquatic invertebrate biologist with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), "While Minnesota has not, as of yet, seen documenttation of an extensive problem with this exotic, Lake Vermilon has a large population of rusty crayfish which are causing some problems. Long Lake, in Chippewa County Wisconsin, where there are high populations of rusty crayfish, has reported problems such as loss of aquatic vegetation and annoyance to swimmers and waders from pinching of toes by the crayfish." Displacement of native crayfish has occurred in many northern Wisconsin lakes and Ontario lakes.

No safe control
There is no environmentally safe control method for rusty crayfish. "Any pesticides that might kill these animals would kill large numbers of other aquatic life as well, with no guarantee that all of the rusty crayfish would be eliminated," said Montz. "Trapping is not effective even when done professionally on an intensive scale. Enhancement of certain predator fish species may help; however, once the rusty crayfish has become established, there is not any method right now to eliminate them."
Harvest of rusty crayfish for food and bait may provide the only beneficial use for this exotic. Bait harvest has been going on for over 30 years in Wisconsin. Commercial harvest for food is more recent and varies from year to year in both Wisconsin and Minnesota. Regulations in both Minnesota and Wisconsin now make it illegal to introduce rusty crayfsh into any waters. In Minnesota, it is illegal to sell live crayfish as bait orfor aquarium use, and a Department of Natural Resources permit is required to commercially harvest or culture crayfish. Live crayfish taken from a waterbody can only be used as live bait in that some waterbody, according to Minnesota regulations. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources allows crayfish to be used as live bait only in the Mississippi River and the Great Lakes.

Education is the key to control
Jensen believes the best way to prevent or slow the spread of rusty crayfish into new waters is through education. He urges everyone not to transport or release crayfish. Boaters should avoid transporting aquatic plants, drain waterfrom boats and motors, and discard unwanted bait on land. Educating anglers, crayfish trappers, bait dealers, and teachers about the threats posed by rusty crayfish will help reduce the risk of spreading rusty crayfish.
For more information on rusty crayfsh see http:// www.d.umn.edu/seagr/areas/aqua/rusty.html. Contact Doug Jensen at 218-726-8712 or djensen1@d.umn.edu or Gary Montz at 651-297-4888 or gary.montz@dnr.state.mn.us.

Identifying Rusty Crayfish
Identifying rusty crayfish can be very difficult and requires looking at a number of characteristics and having enough experience to interpret them. In general, rusty crayfish are larger than native crayfish and have large claws. They have a gap between their black-tipped claws. The main distinguishing characteristic is the rusty-colored spots on the carapace. They look as though they have been picked up with rust-colored paint on your forefinger and thumb, while native crayfish have a dark brown to black patch on the top of the abdomen "tail section". Rusty crayfish claws are grayish-green to reddish-brown and smoother than native crayfish, which have claws that are more blue and have distinct white, wart-like bumps. Contact your local DNR fisheries office or Minnesota Sea Grant if positive identification is required.



back to table of contents

want to go back to the main newsletter directory ?

want to go back to the Sportsmen's Club Home Page ?