articles from May, 2005 newsletter:

** President's Message
** 37th ANNUAL MEETING and DINNER
** THE GOVERNOR'S FISHING OPENER
** Trapping Completed at Northern Pike Spawning Area
** Summary of 2004 Fish Population Assessment for Lake Vermilion
** Lake Vermilion Resource Mapping, Summer 2004
** Observations of a Lake Inventory Volunteer
** Lakeshore: an endangered habitat
** Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District
** Follow-up to Club Members' Concerns Regarding USX "3-Bays" Proposal
** VOLUNTEERS NEEDED FOR PICNIC SITES
** LOON COUNT 2005
** "Invasive Species!"
** MINNTAC DRAFT EIS RELEASED
** Minnesota's Nongame Wildlife Program is a Success Story Still Being Told
** ON THE LIGHTER SIDE - Do You Know Your Ninnesota State Symbols?
** Fishing success leads to excess
** LAKE VERMILION IS NOT IMMUNE TO POACHERS!




back to table of contents


President's Message




SPRING! What a beautiful one it has been so far! Of course this is being written in mid-April so there's plenty of time between now and fishing opener for things to change. The last vestiges of ice are disappearing to the west out of Frazer Bay so the lake should be ice-free in the next day or two. This has been one of the earliest ice-outs in my memory over the past 40 some years that I have fished Lake Vermilion. Speaking of the fishing opener, a very big thank you to all who have volunteered to be hosts for the event. Preparations have proceeded very well and John Zwieg deserves a bow for representing the Sportsmen's Club.

I also want to thank all the new members (over 100) who signed up in the last couple of months. We hope it was due to our mass mailing effort of our newsletter to prospective members that enticed you to join. We hope that the articles were informative and that you support our efforts to protect and enhance Lake Vermilion. We welcome any comments and suggestions that you have to make our efforts more meaningful. Again, thank you for your response.

The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) concerning the proposed discharge of MINNTAC tailings pond water into the Dark River, Sandy River or St. Louis River has been released for public comment as of April 11, 2005. The letter releasing this Draft EIS is reprinted in this newsletter and gives details on the public meeting and how to submit comments.

The USX proposed development of their property on the eastern end of Vermilion called the "3 Bays on Vermilion" is still in process. There has been an interesting change of position by USX in that they now want to change from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) proposal to a standard subdivision of their property. To my mind that doesn't address the objections raised in dozens of letters to the St. Louis County Planning Commission. Thank you to all who sent in their comments. There is a good write-up on the project in the Sunday, April 17, 2005, edition of the Duluth News-Tribune if you want to read more about it.

Just a little over three weeks to the Governor's Fishing Opener and I hope you all have your boats and fishing gear cleaned and ready to go. With spring coming so early this year many of you will already have had your boats out on lakes other than Vermilion. If you have, please make sure to inspect for exotic species and clean if necessary. As we did last year, we will be conducting boat inspections at various launches on Vermilion. This is mainly an education exercise to make people aware of the problem and try to prevent it.

With the Governor's Fishing Opener on Vermilion this year, the traffic - both on and off the lake - is going to be extra heavy, so please be careful. We need you around for many more years!

Sportsmen's Club of Lake Vermilion President,
Walt Moe



back to table of contents


37th ANNUAL MEETING and DINNER



Saturday, August 13 -- Fortune Bay Resort

"Please mark your calendar and plan to attend."

"Watch for more information in the July issue of the newsletter."






back to table of contents


THE GOVERNOR'S FISHING OPENER



The Governor's Fishing Opener Event is in its 57th year, and is one of the largest annual media events in Minnesota. We are hosting this event to showcase Lake Vermilion. It is a partnership between our Lake Vermilion community and the Minnesota Office of Tourism. This is the first time in its history that the opener has been on Lake Vermilion.

The Sportsmen's Club has been working hard this past year to recruit 120 fishing boats/hosts in order to provide a great day of fishing and showcase the hospitality of our lake community. Some events for the general public include the Governor's Radio Show on PBS from Cook, from 9:00-10:00 a.m. on Friday, May 13, and a FREE community parade and picnic at the Tower Civic Center focusing on family activities on Friday, May 13, starting at 4:30 p.m. At the picnic there will be DNR Minnaqua program booths (fish identification, fish painting,etc.) as well as local entertainment on stage.

More updated detailed information can be found on the website: www.mngovernorsopener.com

Please join in the fun and excitement of sharing our beautiful lake!



back to table of contents


Trapping Completed at Northern Pike Spawning Area



Each year the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Fisheries and the Sportsmen's Club of Lake Vermilion operate the Sunset Creek Northern Pike Spawning Area on the west end of Lake Vermilion. Located near the public landing in Head-U-Lakes Bay, the Sunset Creek is blocked off with stop logs to create a rearing pond for northern pike.

A fish trap is placed in the creek in April when the northerns start their spawning run. Club volunteers check the trap twice a day and release the northerns in the rearing pond to spawn. Twenty females and 40 males are transferred to the pond - the calculated number of fish the pond will support. After this number is met, the trap is removed by the DNR. This year's run was completed in about one week. The trap was set April 6 and the quota of fish was met April 14.

After the adult fish have spawned, they return to the lake over the dam. Then sometime in the first part of June, DNR Fisheries contacts club volunteer Rick Pearson and he begins removing the stop logs, one each day until the pond is lowered. Rick reports he props up one end of the log in the morning and lets the water flow through, then later comes back to remove the stop log. If he's quiet when he returns, he can sometimes see a large mass of northern fry suddenly go over the dam when they sense the current. The fry are three to four inches long by then and as Rick says, "Half of that is head!"

The purpose of the rearing pond is to give the northern fry a chance to grow, giving them a better survival rate once they return to the lake. The DNR estimates the Sunset Creek Rearing Pond produces 10,000 to 15,000 fry each year.

This year's volunteers for the trap were Rick and Judy Pearson, John and Claire Zwieg, Mal and Dawn Berg, Warren Vollmar, Ray Harris and Dale and Nan Lundblad.



back to table of contents




Summary of 2004 Fish Population Assessment For Lake Vermilion

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Area Fisheries Headquarters
650 Hwy. 169
Tower, MN 55790
(218)753-2580

Introduction

Lake Vermilion is part of the statewide Large Lake Program, an intensive fisheries management program on the 10 largest lakes in Minnesota. The Large Lake Program was started in 1984, when it became apparent that more detailed biological information was needed to properly manage these important lakes. A Large Lake Specialist was assigned to each lake to manage the program at the area level. The Large Lake Program includes annual population assessments, annual water quality monitoring, and regularly scheduled creel surveys. Creel surveys are scheduled on Lake Vermilion for two consecutive years out of every six years. Creel surveys were done in 2002 and 2003. The next cycle of creel surveys will be in 2008 and 2009.
A variety of sampling gear is used during population assessments to collect the various fish species and life stages. Gill nets are used to sample cisco, northern pike, yellow perch, and walleye. Trap nets are used to sample muskie, bluegill and black crappie. Beach seines are used to sample young-of-the-year walleye and perch. An electrofishing boat is used to sample smallmouth bass and young-ofthe-year walleye. Sampling for each gear type is conducted at the same time and place each year in order to determine population trends for the major species. Data is also collected on length, weight, age, and growth for each of the major species.
The results of the 2004 fish population assessment are presented in the balance of this report. We encourage anyone with questions or comments to contact the Tower Fisheries offce or stop by our office for a visit. We are located just west of Tower on Highway 169.

Duane Williams, Large Lake Specialist, 218-753-2580, ext. 224
duane.williams@dnr.state.mn.us

Joe Geis, Area Fisheries Supervisor, 218-753-2580, ext. 222
joe.geis@dnr.state.mn.us

MN Dept. Of Natural Resources
Division of Fisheries
650 Hwy. 169
Tower, MN 55790



Walleye

The walleye gill net catch in the fall of 2004 was 17.6 fish/net, well above the historical average for Lake Vermilion. Walleye gill net catches have been above average for a number of years, due to strong year classes produced in 1995, 1997, 1998, 2001, and 2002. The walleye gill net catch in 2002 was the highest ever observed on Lake Vermilion. Poor reproduction in 2000 contributed to a decline in the walleye catch in 2003, although the walleye catch improved in 2004 when fish from a strong 2002 year class began to be sampled in the gill nets.
There are often differences in fish populations between the two major lake basins, East Vermilion and West Vermilion. Because of these differences, much of the data collected is analyzed separately for the two lake basins in order to better understand fish dynamics on the entire lake. The 2004 walleye gill net catch on East Vermilion was slightly higher than the West Vermilion walleye catch. Historically, walleye catches are usually higher on East Vermilion, although the average size is larger on West Vermilion.
The mean length of walleye sampled in gill nets was 13.6 inches, well above the historical average. The large average size was due to above average numbers of walleye 17-20 inches long in the gill net catch. These fish were primarily from strong year classes produced in 1997 and 1998. Although the numbers of large walleye are above average, their numbers are still quite low compared to the number of small walleye in the population. The gill net catch of 11 inch walleye was about double the historical average, reflecting a strong year class produced in 2002. The gill net catch of 14 and 15 inch walleye was below average, reflecting a poor 2000 year class.
Smaller walleye are nearly always more abundant than medium and large fish, although the gill net catch does not reflect that. The experimental gill nets used for population assessments do not sample small fish very well and they are under-represented in the gill net catch. Walleye are not sampled at maximum efficiency until they are about 13 inches long. The decline in the gill net catch of fish larger than 13 inches represents the effects of mortality and declining abundance.
Walleye year class strength is represented by indices that are calculated from gill net catches of each year class for each year of netting. An index of 100 would be considered average. The strongest year classes produced in recent years were the 1997, 1998, and 2001 year classes, which had indices of 159, 157, and 157, respectively. The 1999 year class is also slightly stronger than average. Four of the five year classes produced from 1997 to 2001 were stronger than average. Generally, strong year classes are produced about every three years in natural walleye lakes. The weakest year class produced in recent years was the 2000 year class, which had an index of 39. Nearly all of the major fish species in Lake Vermilion had poor reproduction in 2000, probably due to unusually cool weather in June of that year. Most of the major species had very good reproduction in 1997 and 1998, which was probably related to favorable environmental conditions in those years.
Three years of netting are needed to calculate a year class strength index, therefore indices cannot yet be calculated for the 2002, 2003, and 2004 year classes. Two years of netting indicate the 2002 year class will probably be stronger than average, particularly on West Vermilion.
Angling prospects for walleye in 2005 are about average. A strong 2001 year class will provide good angling opportunities for walleye that will be about 13 inches long at the beginning of the fishing season. Fishing will be hurt by below average numbers of 1415 inch walleye from a poor 2000 year class. Anglers can also expect to catch good numbers of small walleye from a strong 2002 year class. Most walleye from the 2002 year class will be 11-12 inches long at the start of the season. As these fish grow during the summer they will become increasingly acceptable to anglers. Above average numbers of 17-20 inch walleye will provide anglers a good opportunity to catch some larger fish as well.
In an effort to maintain fishing quality, the DNR is proposing a special regulation for walleye on Lake Vermilion, beginning in 2006. A regulation change is being proposed because of increased fishing pressure and walleye harvest in recent years. Creel surveys in 2002 and 2003 documented the highest walleye harvest ever observed on Lake Vermilion, well above the long-term goal for the lake. Consistent harvest above the long-term goal could have negative consequences for the walleye population.
Two potential regulations are being offered for consideration:
* A 17-26 inch protected slot with one fish allowed over 26 inches.
* A 17-26 inch protected slot with one fish allowed over 26 inches, and a 4-fish daily
and possession bag limit.
Adding the 4-fish bag limit offers the best chance to keep harvest at a safe level. A 4-fish bag limit would also be consistent with regulations recently adopted on other large walleye lakes in Minnesota.
There will be a formal public input process in September of 2005, including public input meetings and a time period for submitting written or verbal comments. Signs will also be posted at public accesses and resorts this spring informing anglers a regulation change is under consideration. If adopted, the new regulation would go into effect on May 13, 2006.
Fall electrofishing is used to sample young-of-the-year walleye and help determine reproductive success for the year. The 2004 fall electrofishing catch of young-of-the year walleye was 91 fishfhour, slightly below the historical average. Electrofishing catches have historically varied widely on Lake Vermilion, due in part to variation in year class strength. East Vermilion usually has higher electrofishing catches of young-of-the-year walleye than West Vermilion.
The mean length of young-of-the-year walleye sampled by electrofishing was 4.6 inches, well below the historical average. Data from our sampling program indicates growth of young-of-the-year walleye is an important factor in eventual year class strength, with fast growing young-of-the-year walleye producing strong year classes and slow growing fish producing weak year classes. It is believed that large young-of-the-year walleye have better over winter survival than small fish. The mean length of young-of-the-year walleye can be used with the total number caught in a predictive model that will give a good indication of how strong a year class will be. The mean length and total catch indicate the 2004 year class will probably be much weaker than average. Unusually cool summer weather kept growth very slow, which will likely cause a poor year class.


Northern Pike

The 2004 gill net catch of northern pike was 1.3 fish/net, slightly above the historical average. Gill net catches of northern pike have historically been fairly stable at a relatively low level. West Vermilion usually has higher gill net catches of northern pike than East Vermilion.
The mean length of northern pike sampled by gill nets was 25;7 inches, slightly above the historical average. A wide size range of northern pike were sampled, although the total sample size was only 26 fish. Year class strength has been fairly average in recent years, although a strong year class was produced in 2001. Angling prospects for northern pike in 2005 should be similar to recent years, although anglers may catch more small fish than usual from the strong 2001 year class.
A 24-36 inch protected slot limit for northern pike went into effect on Lake Vermilion in 2003. All fish 24-36 inches long must immediately be returned to the lake. The bag limit remains at three fish, which could include up to three fish under 24 inches or one fish over 36 inches. The new regulation is part of a statewide initiative to improve the size structure of pike populations in a number of lakes across the state.


Yellow Perch

The 2004 gill net catch of yellow perch was 40.8 fish/net, the highest perch catch on the lake since 1991. The high 2004 catch was due to large numbers of small fish from strong 2001 and 2002 year classes. Gill net catches of yellow perch are usually similar between East Vermilion and West Vermilion, although the West Vermilion catch was much higher in 2004.
The mean length of perch sampled by gill nets was 6.9 inches, well below the historical average. The small average size was due to high numbers of 5-6 inch perch in the gill net catch from strong 2001 and 2002 year classes. All size classes of perch were well represented in the gill net catch. Strong year classes of perch were produced in 2001 and 2002, while poor year classes were produced in 1999 and 2000. Anglers can expect to catch more small perch than usual in 2005, particularly in West Vermilion. Larger perch are available to anglers in the Big Bay area of East Vermilion. Perch in the Big Bay area tend to be larger than those in other areas of the lake, probably because they feed extensively on rusty crayfish that are abundant in that area of the lake.


Bluegill

The 2004 trap net catch of bluegill was 35.3 fish/net, slightly above the historical average. Bluegill catches have been highly variable for several years, with an unusually high catch in 2001 and an unusually low catch in 2002. Bluegill are much more abundant in West Vermilion and trap net catches there are always much higher than catches on East Vermilion.
The mean length of bluegill sampled by trap nets was 6.0 inches, which is near the historical average. Above average numbers of 6-7 inch bluegill were sampled from strong year classes produced in 1997 and 1998. A strong year class of bluegill was also produced in 1995, while a very weak year class was produced in 2000. Anglers can expect good bluegill fishing in 2005, particularly on West Vermilion. The angler's catch will be dominated by 6-7 inch fish from the strong 1997 and 1998 year classes. The number of bluegill in the population 8 inches and larger is about average, so there is some opportunity to catch larger fish as well. Bluegill fishing for larger fish should improve in the next several years as fish from the strong 1995, 1997, and 1998 year classes grow and attain a size more desirable by anglers.


Black Crappie

The 2004 black crappie trap net catch was 2.2 fish/net, slightly above the historical average. Trap net catches of crappie have been relatively stable in recent years. Crappie numbers have historically been relatively low on Lake Vermilion, although a few areas of West Vermilion seem to have higher numbers of fish. Crappie trap net catches are usually higher on West Vermilion than East Vermilion.
The mean length of black crappie sampled by trap nets was 8.1 inches, slightly below the historical average. High numbers of 8 inch crappie were sampled from a strong year class produced in 2001. The trap net catch of 11 inch crappie was also above average. These fish were primarily from strong year classes produced in 1997 and 1998. Angling prospects for crappie in 2005 are better than average. There are fair numbers of 11-12 inch fish available from the strong year classes produced in 1997 and 1998. Crappie from the strong 2001 year class will be somewhat small this year, however they will provide good angling opportunities in 2006.


Smallmouth Bass

An electrofishing boat is used as the standard sampling gear for smallmouth bass because they are not often caught in standard assessment nets. The 2004 smallmouth bass catch was 43.7 fish/hour of electrofishing, well above the historical average. Electrofishing catches of smallmouth bass have been above average since 1998. Sampling was not done in 2000 due to poor weather. The smallmouth bass catch was higher on East Vermilion than West Vermilion, although bass catches are usually higher on West Vermilion.
Smallmouth bass sampled by electrofishing had a mean length of 11.2 inches, well above the historical average. The large average size was due to an unusually high catch of 13-15 inch bass from strong 1997 and 1998 year classes. Above average numbers of 9-10 inch bass were also sampled, primarily from a strong year class produced in 2001. A relatively poor year class of smallmouth bass was produced in 2000. Angling prospects for smallmouth bass are very good in 2005. Fish from a very strong 1997 year class are now 13-15 inches long. Lesser numbers of larger fish will be available to anglers from the older age classes in the population. Fishing for large fish should improve in the next several years as fish from the strong 1997 and 1998 year classes continue to grow.


Muskie

Muskie population assessments are done every four years on Lake Vermilion, although East Vermilion and West Vermilion are done in different years due to the large size of the lake. Population assessments were done on East Vermilion in 2001 and on West Vermilion in 2002. The next assessments are scheduled for 2005 and 2006. The muskie program has been very successful on Lake Vermilion and the lake is now recognized as one of the top muskie fisheries in Minnesota.


Exotic Species

Several exotic species have become established in Lake Vermilion in the last 20 years. Rusty crayfish were first observed in 1986 and have since become extremely abundant in the eastern part of the lake. Purple loosestrife, a flowering plant that grows in wetlands and along shorelines, has been found at a number of locations on Lake Vermilion. Heterosporis, a microsporidean fish parasite, has been identified in two walleye in recent years. Heterosporis has been identified in several other Minnesota lakes and research is currently under way on the distribution and life history of this parasite. A small infestation of curly leaf pondweed was discovered in Everett Bay in 2001. Curly leafpondweed is an aquatic plant native to Europe, although it has been present in areas of the United States and southern Minnesota for many years.
There is potential for other exotic species to become established in Lake Vermilion, which attracts anglers and boaters from all across Minnesota and the Midwest. The DNR has taken several steps to prevent the spread of exotic species. It is now illegal to transport exotic species, infested water, and aquatic vegetation from lake to lake. The DNR has also established a program to educate the public about exotic species and inspect boats at some public accesses. The DNR held a training seminar on boat inspections for members of the Sportsmen's Club of Lake Vermilion and the Lake Vermilion Resort Association in 2004. Sportsmen's Club members conducted boat inspections several times during the summer, educating the boating public about exotic species.


Fishing Tournaments

There has been an increase in fishing tournaments on Lake Vermilion in recent years, generating some concerns among other lake users. The DNR considers fishing tournaments to be a legitimate activity on Minnesota lakes, as long as prescribed regulations and guidelines are followed. The Minnesota Legislature passed a bill in 2000 that established regulations to manage fishing tournaments. These regulations were developed by the DNR with input from the public, tournament organizers, and DNR staff. Area and Regional Fisheries staff will work within the framework of state regulations to manage tournaments on Lake Vermilion in a manner that will protect fish populations and minimize conflict with other lake users. Permits from the DNR are needed for most fishing tournaments. Permits have been issued or applications received for the following tournaments on Lake Vermilion in 2005.
  • Gander Mountain Invitational Bass Tournament, 110 boats, June 25.
  • Lake Vermilion Musky Challenge, 60 boats, August 12-13.
  • Vermilion Walleye Classic, 25 boats, Sept. 3-4.
  • Simply Fishing Muskie Classic, 100 boats first 3 days, 30 boats 4th day, and 10 boats 5th day, Sept. 14-18.
The Sportsmen's Club of Lake Vermilion has also developed a set of guidelines for tournaments on Lake Vermilion. While the DNR must manage tournaments in accordance with state law, the guidelines can be used in some situations to help write tournament permits.


Fish Stocking

The Minnesota DNR operates a major walleye egg-take operation and hatchery at the mouth of the Pike River on Lake Vermilion. Walleye produced at the hatchery are used for stocking programs in northeastern Minnesota and other areas of the state. Because it is DNR policy to return at least 10% of the walleye fry produced at hatcheries back into the parent lake, Lake Vermilion is stocked with 10-20 million walleye fry each year. It is not known how much the stocked fry actually contribute to the walleye population. Large natural walleye lakes usually have aufficient natural reproduction to maintain the population and seldom benefit from additional stocking.
An intensive muskie stocking program was started on Lake Vermilion in 1987. The current stocking quota is 5,000 muskie fingerlings every other year. Stocking rates may be reduced in the future if sign)ficant natural reproduction is documented.
The DNR and the Sportsmen's Club of Lake Vermilion cooperatively operate a controlled northern pike spawning area at Sunset Creek on the west end of the lake. The spawning area is stocked with brood fish and water levels are maintained at an optimal level for spawning and production of fingerlings.


Habitat and Water Ouality

Preserving fish habitat and water quality continues to be a management priority on Lake Vermilion. Shoreline development and development within the watershed could result in habitat loss and degradation of water quality. The DNR has several programs that protect fish habitat and water quality, primarily by regulating shoreline alterations and the removal of aquatic plants. Aquatic vegetation and shallow near-shore areas both provide critical habitat for a number of fish species. Retaining publicly owned lakeshore is also an important strategy to preserve critical aquatic habitat.
County and local units of government also play an important role in protecting fish habitat and preserving water quality. They establish zoning regulations and regulate septic systems, in addition to a number of other programs. The new Lake Vermilion Land Use Plan will be an important tool for developing policies that protect fish habitat and water quality.
Citizen groups and private individuals also have an important role in protecting fish habitat and water quality. The Sportsman's Club of Lake Vermilion has long been an advocate of policies to protect water quality. Lakeshore property owners can also take a number of steps to manage their shoreline in an environmentally sound manner. For more information on properly managing lakeshore, go to the DNR website at www.dnr.state.mn.us.




back to table of contents


Lake Vermilion Resource Mapping, Summer 2004


During the summer and Fall of 2004, the Arrowhead Regional Development Commission (ARDC) and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) coordinated an effort to map aquatic vegetation and substrates on Lake Vermilion utilizing Geographic Information Systems (GTS). Funding for the project was contributed by the DNR and St. Louis County. Based on successful results of an earlier shoreline development inventory that utilized citizen volunteers, ARDC and the DNR determined that the mapping of aquatic vegetation and substrates could be accomplished in a similar manner.

ARDC would like to thank the volunteers, many of which are SCLV members, who contributed their time and efforts to this mapping project. In early March, local resource managers and ARDC staff began discussions regarding future use of the data that has been collected and possible future mapping efforts. There may be opportunities in the future to collect or inventory additional data pertaining to Lake Vermilion, and the use of volunteers where appropriate is strongly supported.

Maps, summary documents, and presentations that deal with the Lake Vermilion Resource Mapping project are available on the ARDC web page, at http://www.ardc.org/projects/lakevermilion/ Additionally, spatial data for use in GTS Mapping Systems are available for download by those with the appropriate software.

For more information about the Lake Vermilion Resource Mapping Project contact:

David Yapel, Sr. GIS Specialist
Arrowhead Regional Development Commission
221 West l Street, Duluth, MN 55802
218-529-7539; dyapel@ardc.org



back to table of contents


Observations of a Lake Inventory Volunteer



My wife and I had the pleasure of participating in the above discussed project of mapping aquatic vegetation and bottom substrates along the shores of Lake Vermilion last September. With the assistance of volunteers Ron and Margaret Johnson of Whispering Winds Resort, we spent parts of four days idling along in a fishing boat looking into the water and recording what we observed. Our assignment was to map all of Head-O-Lakes Bay and its islands. This equates to approximately 18.5 miles of shoreline. While this may sound like a a somewhat tedious and even boring activity, I can assure you that it was quite the opposite. First, it gave us a good excuse to take time away from work and other obligations to spend crisp, clear, fall days on this spectacularly beautiful lake. Second, because of the nature of the task, it forced us to drastically slow down and alter our awareness of the lake.

Most of us experience Lake Vermilion while cruising in a Rower boat at considerable speed, at an appropriately safe distance from shore as our senses are lulled by the roar of the engine and the whoosh of the wind blowing by. While that is certainly a pleasurable experience, sometimes it is much more interesting to quietly move along the shoreline and take in all of the natural sights, sounds and smells. Loons, ducks and cormorants swim by and look us over curiously. Mink run along the rocks on the shoreline. Turtles sun themselves on partially submerged logs. Great Blue Herons stalk frogs and minnows in ultraslow motion. Squirrels sit in the trees and chatter at us. Eagles perch in the dead tree tops and look down warily. Kingfishers noisily swoop by. In the clear water, fresh water clams, crayfish and occasional fish are clearly visible on the bottom. A diving loon flashes by chasing minnows. When we closely pass by inhabited sections of shoreline we are fascinated by the differing degrees to which property owners have chosen to develop their properties. We live on this bay and have never noticed much of what we now see. The relaxing sound of water lapping on the shore, the invigorating smell of pine and juniper in the air and the warm sun on our backs further enhance the experience. We almost forget that we are out there to gather data to help resource managers protect Lake Vermilion.

The purpose of this lake-wide effort is to create, for the first time, a complete map of vegetation types found in Lake Vermilion and provide important information of where different fish habitats can be found. This snapshot of aquatic vegetation will allow us to monitor changes in vegetation over time as a result of exotic species such as the Rusty Crayfish, and potential changes as a result of development pressure. The bottom substrate inventory will provide baseline information on potential spawning areas for various fish species.

One of the most surprising observations we made during our study of the Head-O-Lakes Bay area was just how little aquatic vegetation was present relative to the total amount of shoreline. Vegetated areas are, of course, the most productive in terms of the food chain which supports the fishery and, of course, birds and other animals that feed upon fish. This seemingly obvious evidence of just how fragile the ecosystem might be provides legitimate reason for concern. Unfortunately, ignorance causes too many of us to regard aquatic vegetation as "weeds," that we need to remove or eradicate, at least in front of our lakeshore homes. These attitudes must be changed through education so we come to value aquatic vegetation for the precious resource that it is. We all need to learn to be better stewards of oui lake by acquiring a new respect for the foundations of life contained in it. We can begin by taking the time to slow down and truly observe the amazing web of life that exists along our shore- lines.

Dale Lundblad - Board Member



back to table of contents


Lakeshore: an endangered habitat


One of the most endangered natural habitats in Minnesota is our native lakeshore land. People typically buy lakeshore lots because they love the lake country and they love the outdoors. However, there is a terrible stereotype of what the "perfect" lakeshore lot should look like when developed. It includes an open manicured bluegrass lawn right down to the water's edge. All the aquatic plants are removed and a sand blanket is put in to create a swimming beach.

These landowners have perfectly good intentions not to damage the environment. However, what they have really done is to eliminate the natural diversity of their lakeshore habitat and replace it with a boring labor-intensive backyard "just like the one they left behind in the city."

What's wrong with this picture? Bluegrass lawns require constant treatment with fertilizers and herbicides that can wash directly into the lake. This can accelerate aging of the lake from increased algal blooms and aquatic plant growth and possibly kill aquatic plant organisms, including fish, from oxygen deple- tion.

The water "weeds" that were ripped out to make the swimming beach were actually native aquatic plants that help prevent shoreline erosion. They helped purify the water and they created oxygen. They provided habitat for hundreds of aquatic organisms, game fish, forage fish, and nesting sites for water birds like loons, grebes, redwinged blackbirds and ducks. All those species go homeless without aquatic vegetation. Many homeowners feel obligated to cut bulrushes and illegally remove aquatic vegetation that they perceive as weeds.

The native trees, shrubs, wildflowers and moist soil plants along lake shorelines provide one of Minnesota's richest wildlife habitats it is our "rain forest" in terms of biological diversity. When these are removed to make way for bluegrass, the habitat value is destroyed. In fact, the open lawn down to the water's edge is an invitation for nuisance wildlife problems to occur. The deep roots of these plants stabilized the shoreline banks; now they are replaced by shallow-rooted sod.

Many lakeshore owners are now starting to realize that something is amiss on their lake. The fish populations are declining. They see fewer wildlife and birds along the shore. They complain about nuisance Canada Geese feeding on the lawn. They see more erosion and spend more time mowing the lawn than fishing. The lake is green with algae. This "perfect" lakeshore has actually become a lakeshore environment that is ecologically dysfunctional. Natural lakeshore has consequently become an endangered habitat.

The solution: lakescaping for wildlife and water quality - The solution to these problems is a fresh, ecological, holistic look at lakeshore lot management and habitat preservation. It's a way to have a neat attractive lakeshore lot that is more in balance with nature and that actually requires less lawn mainte- nance and very little use of herbicides or fertiliiers. It's called "Lakescaping" for wildlife and water quality.

At the heart of the lakescaping concept is the creation of a buffer zone along the shoreline. A buffer zone is a natural strip of vegetation along at least 75 percent of a property's frontage. It extends both onto the land and into the water to a distance at least 25 to 50 feet, where possible.

The goal of creating a buffer zone is to restore the shoreline - both on shore and in the water - with the vegetation that occurred there in the first place, while still providing for reasonable lake access and recreational opportunities for your family. For example, if you own 100 feet of lakeshore frontage, think in terms of naturalizing about 75 feet of shoreline and using 25 feet for lake access, a boat dock, and/or a swimming area.

A different type of landscaping Lakescaping includes planting native trees, shrubs, wildflowers, grasses and sedges on land, and emergent, floating, and submergent aquatic plants in the water. It differs from a typical home landscaping approach where favorite plants are selected, then to get the plantings to survive, the landowner alters the growing environment. This results in the need to provide plants with fertilizer, pesticides, and supplemental water. It also adds labor.

In the lakescaping approach, the landowner first assesses the growing environment ... fertility, soil, drainage, moisture level ... and then selects plants that will grow naturally under these conditions. With this approach, supplemental water, fertilizers, pesticides, or excessive labor won't be necessary because the site provides all the right growing conditions and increases the chances of lakescaping success.

There is not a perfect lake lot A main point to keep in mind is that there is no one stereo- type of the perfect lake lot. For a given lake area, study the natural shorelines to learn what the natural conditions are like. What emergent plants are present? What type of wildflowers and shrubs do best in the shoreline setting? Every lake will be unique in regard to soil and bottom conditions, pH, and growing conditions. Talk to other shoreland owners who maintain or who have reestablished natural habitat. Find out what strategies and plants have worked well for them.

The buffer zone restores ecological functions that are reduced or eliminated by traditional lawns planted to the water's edge. Lakescaping for wildlife and water quality will allow you to live at peace with a more natural lakeshore, instead of trying to make it conform to a traditional landscape ideal that throws the lake ecosystem out of balance. Try it. You will enjoy this new dimension in lakeshore living.



back to table of contents


Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District
2005 Native Tree and Plant Sale


Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District (Itasca SWCD) would like to reintroduce you to their Annual Tree and Native Plant Sale. Our purpose for this sale is not only to provide private landowners within ltasca County an important service, but also to promote native plantings. With increased shoreland development on many of the county's lakes and rivers, there is a need for shoreland plantings.

Shoreland plantings provide benefits at several levels:
  • 1) from a landowner's point of view, these plantings can provide increased beauty, privacy and shoreland protection;
  • 2) the surrounding lake/river community benefits as these plantings develop a visual screen and improve fish and wildlife habitat;
  • 3) the lake/river itself also benefits as runoff, sediment load and nutrients are decreased resulting in improved water quality.

    While emphasis is placed on shoreland plantings, the variety of native trees, shrubs, wildflowers, grasses and sedges offered can also meet the goals of non-shoreland property owners. These goals may include forestry practices such as planting, improving wildlife habitat, hiding a septic mound, revegetating a bare soil area, establishing a border between properties, or simply increasing the beauty of the land.

    Whether you live on shoreland property or not, the Itasca SWCD Tree and Native Plant Sale can help you accomplish your planting goals. We look forward to meeting your planting needs this year and in years to come!



    back to table of contents


    Follow-up to Club Members' Concerns Regarding USX "3-Bays" Proposal


    Sportsmen's Club of Lake Vermilion

    To: St. Louis County Planning Commission
    Date: April 6, 2005
    Subject: USX "3-Bays" Proposal for Lake Vermilion


    The Sportsmen's Club of Lake Vermilion (SCLV) is a non-profit, 1800 member organization founded in 1968 and dedicated to the "Protection and Improvement of Lake Vermilion." The SCLV was invited to participate on the Lake Vermilion Plan Citizen Steering Committee from its inception. SCLV board members have participated in every Lake Vermilion Plan meeting held to date and fully support the Plan and its proposed zoning provisions. One or more of our board members has also attended each of the public 3-Bays Project meetings. We are vitally interested and concerned about the "3 Bays" Project because it contradicts the proposed Lake Vermilion Plan and also the County approved Tower/Breitung Plan.

    We are providing comments on the 3-Bays Project because we believe that the future of Lake Vermilion land zoning is at an important crossroad. The future of the lake, as described in the currently proposed Lake Vermilion Plan will be adversely impacted if the USX "Conservation Proposal" is approved without serious modification.

    We are in general accord with the majority of concerns and questions raised by the DNR, the St. Louis County Health Dept, the Tower and Breitung Supervisors, Muskies Inc, Steering Committee Members of the Lake Vermilion plan and the public. Our specific areas of concern are: You are to be commended for refusing to consider the request for a 10-lot startup on the 3-Bays Project before all environmental and regulatory concerns are addressed. We feel it is imperative that the entire plan be totally understood and approved before any construction is undertaken.

    From the inquiries and comments the SCLV has received thus far from our members, there is little doubt that there is lake wide concern about this development proposal. The manner in which the Planning Commission deals with this proposal will set the direction for development on Lake Vermilion for many years.

    The SCLV wants to make clear that our organization is not opposed to development that meets current environmental and regulatory standards. We know more de- velopment is coming because Lake Vermilion is such a beautiful asset to northeastern Minnesota. We strongly urge the Planning Commission to make absolutely certain that the permit authorizing this proposed USX development will truly safeguard Lake Vermilion now and for future generations.

    Sincerely, Walter Moe, President
    CC: Mike Forsman, County Commissioner



    back to table of contents


    VOLUNTEERS NEEDED FOR PICNIC SITES


    The Sportsmen's Club of Lake Vermilion is looking for volunteers to periodically check its day-use picnic sites. The volun- teers would be asked to clean up the sites when necessary, check for any vandalism or needed repairs, and report any unauthorized use of the site, such as overnight camping.

    Club members who would like to volunteer their services to monitor one of the picnic sites are asked to contact a member of the SCLV Board (see back page for list of board members). Locations of the picnic sites are available on the clubs web site: http://www.LakeVermilion.com/SCLV



    back to table of contents


    LOON COUNT 2005


    Yes, I know it's early to be thinking about our survey of the loon population; but we all know what happens when we don't plan ahead - crunch time. Because folks move on, physically or by years, we are in constant need of vol- unteers to fatten up our "alternates list." Our club is coming up on our 23rd year of sending our reports to the DNR for their records and conclusions in studying many effects of the loon population fluctuations, and we are a big con- tributor.

    The day of our 2005 survey is Monday, July 11, with an alternate date of Wednesday, July 13, in the event of in- clement weather. We start at 9:00 a.m. at our assigned territory. If you would enjoy taking part, call me, Mardy Jackson, at (218) 753-3549.



    back to table of contents


    "Invasive Species!"


    Yes, we have a new term to learn. In years past, we have been calling Eurasian Milfoil, Curlyleaf Pondweed, Zebra Mussels and other nasty non- native plants and animals, aquatic exotic species In 2004, the Minnesota Legislature renamed this category of lake life aquatic non-native invasive species In fact, the new name would seem to be a much more fitting description of what is happening in Minnesota's lakes and it comes as no surprise that they are still on the move and on the increase.

    As a reminder of where we stand in the state, Eurasian watermilfoil is in 160 lakes and 7 rivers/steams. Curleyleaf Pondweed is in approximately 700 lakes in 80 percent of the counties and has found its way to Lake Vermilion. Zebra Mussels have already been found in two Minnesota inland lakes. You might think about these species as the "big three" of lake "invasives." There is no doubt that they cause extensive ecological, economic and recreational damage. What is worse is that once they occupy a lake they are nearly impossible to eradicate. It would seem that much more active and aggressive DNR action is needed before an invasion takes place as well as after the lakes become infested. A relatively small amount of money is currently spent in the state on fighting this problem, particularly when you think about our "10,000 lakes" and the thousands of boats on trailers ready to be launched all summer long.

    As I am writing this note, two bills have been introduced into our Legislature (HF 1457 and SF 1434) addressing "invasives." The intent of these bills is to secure approximately $5 million in funding to be dedicated to programs combating invasive species. Eligible prevention and management activities would include: developing prevention plans, aquatic invasive species surveys and monitoring, public education and training programs, watercraft inspection programs, boat washing at public and private accesses, etc. While the objectives are admirable and the programs desperately needed, your SCLV Board thinks the proposed funding mechanism of charging $10 per boat for an annual aquatic invasive species sticker needs more thought. Perhaps the current boat license fee could be adjusted to help fund these programs. Clearly, however, more needs to be done in Minnesota to deal with this problem. We are watching the situation and your Club remains active in working on it.

    Once again, the SCLV is going to inspect boats this summer. We are going to ask our volunteers to staff Vermilion's ramps at Hoodoo Point, Moccasin Point, Peterson's Landing and Timbuktu. As we want to look at as many boats as possible, we have selected a Friday and Saturday on three holidays; Memia1 weekend (May 27 & 28), July 4th weekend (July 1 & 2) and Labor Day weekend (September 2 & 3). We will be out there on Friday 4PM-6PM and 6PM-8PM and on Saturday from 7AM-9AM. In the larger scheme of things, this effort may appear to be insignificant. Many people believe an invasion of non-native species is inevitable. Nevertheless, your Club intends to shine as much light on this grave problem as it can. You can help by cleaning your boat and trailer before you enter any lake/river waters and sharing this information with your neighbors.

    by Bob Wilson



    back to table of contents


    MINNTAC DRAFT EIS RELEASED


    The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the U.S. Steel Minntac proposed discharge into the Sandy River, a tributary to Lake Vermilion, was released by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) on April 11, 2005. The mandatory 45-day public comment period will end on May 25, 2005. During this period, any person may provide comments on the EIS or the project to the MPCA. The MPCA will conduct a public informational meeting on the EIS on Wednesday, April 27, 2005, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Mesabi Commu- nity College in Virginia. Both written and oral comments will be accepted by the MPCA. Persons wishing to obtain a copy of the EIS on compact disk may contact John Elling, MPCA Project Manager at (651) 282-9885 or by e-mail at john.elling@pca.state.mn.us.

    As reported in earlier newsletters, the SCLV has contracted with Dr. Euan Reavie, from the University of Minnesota, Natu- ral Resources Research Institute, Center for Water and Envi- ronment, to provide expertise to the Board on this issue. Fol- lowing are Dr. Reavie's comments on the draft EIS:

    I took a good look at the EIS and my comments follow. These comments are paraphrased and condensed.

    The EIS is very thorough. I am used to looking at earlier drafts of these sorts of reports, and it usually doesn't take long to pick out gaping holes in methodology and data assimila- tion. This report has obviously been through significant review, as most of the key ingredients I was expecting (and hoping for) are in there. There is suitable synthesis of current and historical water quality data, and! am pleased with their assessment of background conditions in the receiving systems.

    I mainly evaluated the document with respect to potential impacts on Lake Vermilion. I scanned the hydrologic evalua- tions fairly quickly. With the distance and hydrologic controls that exist between the tailings ponds and Lake Vermilion, hydrologic impacts to Lake Vermilion, or secondary impacts resilting from hydrologic changes, are likely to be minimal. Like- wise, I don 'tforesee any temperature-related impacts to Lake Vermilion from the selected alternative, and I agree with the predictions they make in the "Aquatic Resources" technical memorandum.

    One critical component that is not included in the EIS is the plan for post-startup monitoring. There should be a long- term monitoring plan (LTM) and a performance monitoring plan (PMP). These plans should tell us what they are going to monitor how often, and for how long, after the initiation of the selected alternative. How are they going to gauge the success of the selected alternative to both solve the pond problem and maintain environmental integrity? I assume the LTM and/or PMP are being developed as a separate document, or that they will be developed following concurrence on the selected alternative. I could find no reference to such documents and it's possible I may have missed it. It is critical to have startup monitoring immediately before and after the initiation of pond siphoning and for some regular time interval after initiation. This ensures no impacts to the aquatic systems that were not anticipated from the expected scenarios presented in the tech- nical memoranda. Post-startup monitoring should include frequent sampling of hydrology, sediment, water chemistry, and biota. Sampling would become less frequent after a few years' sampling effort, following confirmation that the environmental impact predictions in the EIS were correct. The LTM would outline the types, locations and frequency of sampling within the ponds and in downgradient ecosystems. It should also provide timelines and criteria for LTM sampling reduction and even- tual delisting.

    If the projected impacts on downgradient systems are considered "acceptable," what conditions would be considered "unacceptable "following start-up? Higher-than-expected concen- trations of methylmercury in the rivers? An unanticipated exceedance of drinking water criteria? A sudden elimination of certain macrophyte species? Perhaps the EIS is not the place to answer such questions, but they need to be provided somewhere before concurrence on the selected alternative.

    There are plenty of water quality data presented in the EIS, but much of what is released from the ponds (e.g., metals, nutri- ents) may end up rapidly binding to organics and ending up in the sediments. Several metals and other contaminants are hydrophobic, and so are typically found in low concentrations in the water because they are readily binding to organic materials in the sediments. This has important implications on organisms at the bottom of the food chain (particularly invertebrates and plants like wild rice that live in or just above the sediments) and of course the organisms that feed on them (e.g., fish). With the same detail as the water quality data, I would like to see a synthesis of sediment quality trends in and down gradient of the ponds. For example, an assessment for the Sandy River would include sediment samples from within the adjacent tailings pond, just downgradient of the seep, and at several sites farther downriver (into the Pike River and closer to Lake Vermilion). This assessment should include historical and modern data, as well as plans (which would typically be in the LTM) to monitor future changes in sediment quality following startup of the selected alternative. The EIS summarizes some of the sediment mercury results, and admits that the data are not yet sufficient to confirm any impacts sediment quality needs to be investigated in much more detail.

    The Sportsmen's Club is presently generating a more formal letter containing questions and comments to the MPCA about the draft EIS. We will keep you informed on the responses to the public input phase.

    Mel Hintz



    back to table of contents


    Minnesota's Nongame Wildlife Program is a Success Story Still Being Told


    Minnesota's Nongame Wildlife Program (NWP) has distinguished itself as one of the most innovative and successful programs of its kind in the nation. The unique skills and professional dedication of its staff continue to make the NWP a leader in conservation of wildlife ranging from bald eagles to butterflies.

    There are more than 800 species of nongame wildlife with backbones (vertebrates) in Minnesota and thousands of species of invertebrates. Of these, 157 species of wildlife have been designated as endangered, threatened, or of special concern. Increasing demands on natural resources continue to put pressure on nongame wildlife populations by changing, damaging, fragmenting and destroying their habitats. They also face threats from unlawful killing and other environmental threats.

    Thanks largely to the Nongame Wildlife Fund the checkoff on state tax returns that allows Minnesotans to donate to help wildlife the program has grown from one staff biologist with no budget in 1977 to six field biologists and $1 million annual budget. Private citizen involvement is essential to the program, not only for its funding, but as a partner in conservation that involves habitat protection, volunteer work in surveys, and observation reports on rare wildlife species.

    Here are some real success stories:

    Bald Eagle

    The bald eagle popula- tion continues to amaze both casual birdwatchers and professional biologists with their phenomenal recovery from once alarmingly low numbers. Bald eagle populations have increased from 181 active nesting territories in 1980 to more than 700 in 2003, producing about 500 young per year! In the Twin City area alone, you may catch a glimpse of more than three dozen pairs soaring through the skies, or nesting in tall treetops.

    Peregrine Falcon

    Peregrine falcons began nesting in Minnesota in 1987 when a pair raised one young at the Multifoods building in Minneapolis. Last year 38 pairs successfully raised 84 young --- testimony to their adaptability and to the Minnesota's Nongame Wildlife Program restoration efforts. Indeed a bright spot among Minnesota's environmental challenges.

    Trumpeter Swans

    At the turn of the last century, the majestic trumpeter swan was missing from the Minnesota landscape. The Minnesota flock now consists of more than 2000 trumpeter swans. This year more than 500 young were hatched. In 1998, a pair of swans nested in southern Minnesota, a first since the I880s. This is truly an exciting success, because the loss of habitat and other factors often prevent the restoration of a rare species.

    Eastern Bluebird

    Bluebirds declined dramatically during the past century due to loss of habitat and nest site competition from house sparrows and European starlings. The DNR Nongame Wildlife Program partnered with the Bluebird Recovery Program of the Audubon Society of Minneapolis to sponsor workshops, publish education materials and promote the placement of bluebird houses to bring back this desirable songbird. Restoration efforts paid off, Minnesota now has one of the most successful bluebird recovery projects in the nation.

    The Common Loon

    Minnesotans love the loon. The haunting call of our state bird is a comforting sound of home. Minnesota now has more nesting loons than any of the continental states. But it takes a lot of effort to keep them here.



    back to table of contents


    ON THE LIGHTER SIDE - Do You Know Your Ninnesota State Symbols?


    Minnesota has many official symbols to help identify what makes our state unique. Most of us know the loon is the Minnesota state bird, but how many know the other state symbols?

    State Bird: Common Loon
    State Gemstone: Lake Superior Agate
    State Tree: Red Pine (Norway Pine)
    State Flower: Lady Slipper
    State Butterfly: Monarch
    State Mushroom: Morel
    State Drink: Milk
    State Fish: Walleye
    State Grain: Wild Rice
    State Muffin: Blueberry
    State Song: Hail! Minnesota


    (From Dept. of Natural Resources, Conservation Volunteer)



    back to table of contents


    Fishing success leads to excess
    Fine and restitution amounts total nearly $8,000 in two cases


    The Turn in Poachers hotline provided conservation officers with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources several leads recently leading to possible fine and restitution amounts totaling nearly $8,000.

    State Conservation Officer Chris Vinton of Detroit Lakes received a TIP call April 1 on some Indiana anglers fishing Straight Lake near Osage in northern Minnesota.

    With the assistance of Conservation Officer Dennis Lang of Perham, the officers found violations ranging from license fraud, misdemeanor over-limits of sunfish and crappie and gross misdemeanor gross over-limit of sunfish. A total of 299 fish were found in excess of legal limits.

    Donald B. Blauvelt, 51, Donald M. Chester, 75, David L Beard, 53, Justin M. Beard, 30, and Robert Leslie Jr., 40, all of Ft. Wayne, Indiana face possible fines and restitution totaling $6,000. Also seized in the investiga- tion were angling licenses, fishing rods and an auger.

    Blauvelt, who pled guilty in Becker County District Court on April 5, was sentenced to $3,200 fine/restitution, sentenced to 365 days in jail stayed for two years and prohibited from fishing for two years. Conservation officers found Blauvelt 239 sunfish over the limit (legal limit: 20 sunfish per angler; 20 gifted to a companion). The court fined Donald M. Chester nearly $175 for purchasing a resident fishing license. Court appearances are set for May 2 for David L. Beard, Justin M. Beard, and Robert Leslie Jr. The three had 52 crappies (22 over-limit) and 98 sunfish (38 over-limit). Fine and restitution for the three amounts to $1,800.

    In another case, State Conservation Officer Tim Gray of Blackduck received a call April 2 about a group of anglers keeping walleye and an over-limit of crappie on Red Lake in northwest Minnesota.

    When Gray checked the anglers they were putting a walleye down a hole in the ice. Six more walleye were found under the back seat storage compartment of their vehicle. There's a moratorium on taking walleye from Red Lake. An over-limit of crappies was found packed inside a suitcase style ice shelter and in several buckets. Total number of fish possessed by three adults and one juvenile angler were 100 crappie (legal possession limit is 10 per angler), 7 walleye, and 12 perch.

    Charged were Viengxay Sivongxay, 44, and Phouvieng Davannavong, 36, both of Savage, MN and Thavy Chirtdavong, 52 of Brooklyn Park, MN. The youth was not charged in the incident. The three men face a combined total of nearly $2,700 in fines and restitution.

    DNR Enforcement Operations Manager, Major Al Heidebrink, said the DNR appreciates help from the public and encourages people who see illegal fishing activities to call the TIP line at (800) 652-9093. The more detailed the description, the more helpful it is to the officers. Most important are boat and vehicle license numbers, the number of people and the area where the activity took place.

    Rich Sprouse
    Public Information Officer
    Minnesota DNR Enforcement
    15011 Highway 115 (Camp Ripley)
    Little Falls, MN 56345-4173
    richard.sprouse@dnr.state.mn.us
    320-616-2511



    back to table of contents


    LAKE VERMILION IS NOT IMMUNE TO POACHERS!


    The Sportsmen's Club encourages you to contact your local DNR Conservation Officer or the TIP (Turn in Poachers) hotline 800-652- 9093, if you observe suspicious activity which could indicate the taking of fish in excess of legal limits.

    Local DNR Conservation Officers:

    Cook End: Brad Schultz - 218-666-6166

    Tower End: Dan Starr - 218-753-2580 Ext. 280



    back to table of contents

    want to go back to the main newsletter directory ?

    want to go back to the Sportsmen's Club Home Page ?